Yves also provides some facilities for creating new "types", but I cannot To "extend" the types, but that suggestion is really aimed at implementors of a Word Processing program, not at people who merely want to modify Word's behaviour. Think Yves ever posted anything other than an experimental version.Īs far as I know, Microsoft's list of "types" (Book, Film etc.) were, in effect, fixed by the creation of the Office Open XML standard - in other words, you would really have to modify the standard to introduce new ones. Just about the only good technical information about Word bibliography was created by Yves Dhondt, who posted a number of utilities at . (This is really little more than a kludge, as I did not have time to understand all of Microsoft's XSL code.) One answer describes how to modify the editing language - it is possible that there is a simpler way than that. It is likely that Word uses different XSL now, but you can check out . I did try to modify the XSL to work around that particular problem, but in response to a question about Word 2007/2010. Or to modify the XSL, which also requires that you distribute *your* XSL to anyone who needs to edit the document and recreate the bibliography. Unless the "et al." problem has been fixed, the only ways to fix it would be to modify the primary editing language to one that uses "et al." rather than "y otros", to use find/replace on the results of the bibliography fields,
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |